Summary of She Dwelt Among the Untrodden Ways - 11655 Words

The Lucy poems William Shuter, Portrait of William Wordsworth, 1798. Earliest known portrait of Wordsworth, painted in the year he wrote the first drafts of The Lucy poems[1] The Lucy poems are a series of five poems composed by the English Romantic poet William Wordsworth (1770–1850) between 1798 and 1801. All but one were first published during 1800 in the second edition of Lyrical Ballads, a collaboration between Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge that was both Wordsworths first major publication and a milestone in the early English Romantic movement.[A 1] In the series, Wordsworth sought to write unaffected English verse infused with abstract ideals of beauty, nature, love, longing and death. The poems were written during a†¦show more content†¦They conceived a plan to settle in Germany with Dorothy and Coleridges wife, Sara, to pass the two ensuing years in order to acquire the German language, and to furnish ourselves with a tolerable stock of information in natural science.[11] In September 1798, Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Dorothy travelled to Germany to explore proximate living arrangements, but this proved difficult. Although they lived together in Hamburg for a short time, the city was too expensive for their budgets. Coleridge soon found accommodations in the town of Ratzeburg in Schleswig-Holstein, which was less expensive but still socially vibrant. The impoverished Wordsworth, however, could neither afford to follow Coleridge nor provide for himself and his sister in Hamburg; the siblings instead moved to moderately priced accommodations in Goslar in Lower Saxony, Germany.[12] SeparationShow MoreRelatedFew Miles Above Tintern Abbey Essay2283 Words   |  10 Pagesnature is passionate and extreme: children feel joy at seeing a rainbow but great terror at seeing desolation or decay. In 1799, Wordsworth wrote several poems about a girl named Lucy who died at a young age. These poems, including â€Å"She dwelt among the untrodden ways† (1800) and â€Å"Strange fits of passion have I known† (1800), praise her beauty and lament her untimely death. In death, Lucy retains the innocence and splendor of childhood, unlike the children who grow up, lose their connection to nature

Should vs. Would How to Choose the Right Word

The words should and would are both  helping verbs (in particular,  modal auxiliaries), but they dont mean the same thing.  Should and would are two of the 10 modal verbs in English (the others are can, could, may, might, must, ought, shall, and will). A  modal is a  verb  that combines with another verb to indicate  mood  or  tense. Should  is actually the  past tense  of another of these modal verbs, shall.  Used as an auxiliary, should  expresses a condition, an obligation, futurity, or probability. Would  is the past tense of the modal verb will.  Used as an auxiliary, would expresses a possibility, an intention, a desire, a custom, or a request. Use should to express an obligation, a necessity, or a prediction; use would to express a wish or a customary action. How to Use Should Use should to express something that is probable, ask a question, or show an obligation or give a recommendation. To express something that is probable, you might say, Joe should be here soon. To ask a question using should, you could say, Should I dress formally for the dance? And, to make a strong recommendation, you might say, You should stop eating so much, or youll soon gain weight. How to Use Would Use would to make a polite request, ask questions, or express something about hypothetical situations. So, to make a polite request using would, you could say, Would you please pass the jelly? To ask a question using this term, you could write, Would you like ketchup with your fries? And, to express a hypothetical sentiment, you might state, If I won the lottery tomorrow, I would quit my job and retire the next day. Examples To use should to express an obligation, you could state: We should try to be more patient with one another. In this example, should expresses something that we (the subject of the sentence) ought to do. The term, would, by contrast, often is used to express a customary action, as in this example: When Joe was younger, he would often take the long way home after school. In this sentence, would expresses a habit or custom that Joe practiced when he was young: that he often took the long way home. Should can also be used to express different degrees of certainty or obligation, which makes mastering this modal verb tricky. For example, consider the modal verb  should go  and how its used in the following two sentences: The bank closes in 15 minutes. We should go there now.Joe should go to the bank only if he needs to get cash. The first example expresses a definite degree of certainty: The bank closes in 15 minutes and, therefore, we need to go right now and get there before closing time. The second sentence expresses a lower degree of certainty: Joe should go to get cash only if needs cash. In other words, if Joe does not need cash, he should not go to the bank. How to Remember the Difference Use should to say that something is the right thing to do; use would to talk about a situation that is possible or imagined. So, add another modal, such as could, to the sentence to see if it still makes sense. For example, you could say: Joe should call his mom this week. This means that Joe ought to call his mom; its the right thing to do. If you add the word could, the sentence doesnt make sense: Joe should call his mom this week if he could. That sentence doesnt work because Joes obligation to call his mom has nothing to do with whether he could (is able to) call her. Its still his obligation and the right thing to do. But, if you were to say: Joe would call his mom if he were able to do so. Youre talking about a situation that is possible or imagined; Joe would call his mom, but due to circumstances, he may not be able to do so. You could add the phrase if he could to the sentence and it would still make sense: Joe would call his mom if he could. Another way to think of it is should is solid—it is something that ought to happen. Would is wobbly—its something that might happen but probably wont. British vs. American Usage As noted, in general usage, should implies an obligation or something that ought to be done, and would implies something that is possible. However, in formal British English, there is an alternative use for should, which reverses its meaning compared to American English. In formal British English, a person might say: I should like a cup of tea before I go to bed. In this case, should does not mean a sense of obligation or something that ought to happen. Used as such, its meaning is closer to the word would, as in something that is possible. Indeed, in American Engish, a speaker would say or a writer would write: I would like a cup of tea before I go to bed. This means that being given a cup of tea is something that might happen, but it might not, This, then, is actually the meaning a person is conveying if she is using formal British English. Sources â€Å"Difference between SHOULD, COULD, and WOULD.†Ã‚  Espresso English, March 19, 2019.â€Å"How to Use Should, Would and Could.†Ã‚  EF English Live, April 3, 2019.â€Å"SHOULD: Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary.†Ã‚  Cambridge Dictionary.â€Å"What Is the Difference between Could, Would, and Should?, Ask The Editor, Learners Dictionary.

Talking To My Country by Stan Grant Free Essays

string(123) " that historical suffering is the communal, emotional and spiritual wound, throughout the lifetime of a person or a group\." Talking To My Country by Stan Grant (2016) is an individual account of an Aboriginal man residing in and navigating between two traditions in Australia. It is a personal contemplation on ethnicity, traditions, and nationwide character that is both profoundly thought-provoking, poignant and troubling. It has left me stunned at my own lack of understanding about the genuine circumstances surrounding Australia’s settlement, the acts of violence committed against the Aboriginal people and, dismayed and disconcerted at my personal want of understanding and gratefulness for Aboriginal people and their care of and love for our country. We will write a custom essay sample on Talking To My Country by Stan Grant or any similar topic only for you Order Now I am saddened to say, that before I read this book I had no perception of what it entails to be Aboriginal in Australia. While reading this book I was exasperated by the management of the Aboriginal people and repelled by the awareness that they are still disregarded and grieving today. I should acknowledge also that I have a part to play in this as I have never examined previously what I have, how I got it and who paid the ultimate price for how I live today. I recall in Grades 5 and 6 in Social Studies learning about the settlement of Australia. I recall the posters I took so much pride in making and coloring in showing James Cook, Botany Bay and Sydney Cove and the flag showing the Union Jack. I remember learning about the hardships that faced the settlers and remember only now after reading this book, the token paragraph on the Aboriginal people. It is only when I read Talking To My Country that I fully fathomed that Australia’s settlement was in fact Australia’s dispossession. Grant (2016) is correct when he says we know little about Aboriginal people. (p. 4, para. 3) Identity Stan Grant’s identity as an Aboriginal person growing up in Australia is established on numerous influences. The most important is Country. Country to me has always meant the land I live in and love. Grant (2016) enlightens emotionally in his book that Country for the Aboriginal people incorporates not just the physical land but also spiritual, past, community, financial and traditional facets of being Aboriginal. On reading this book I realise that the perception I have of country is sadly not the concept that Grant (2016) feels and knows intimately in Talking To My Country. Morgan (2008) expresses how Country is a â€Å"calling†¦more than what can be seen with the physical eye†¦Ã¢â‚¬ . Grant (2016, p. 159, para. 1) has this profounder awareness of country as a spiritual bond. It is only when I read this book that I recognized that Grant’s identity is his country, as his Country bestows on him and all Aboriginal people their feeling of place or belonging. Kwaymullina (2008) states that that Aboriginal people are an existing, conscious, discerning, expression of their land. Country is beyond a place or soil. It is a recognition system. Kline, (2018, Topic 5) asserts that this is observed currently in salutations which enables people to position others in the traditional environment of Country. Country also embodies the spiritual. In Talking To My Country, Grant (2016) illustrates how country is the heart of Aboriginal spirituality. â€Å"I will always sit by a river or stand on my land and hear the voices and see the faces of my people. My children and their children will always be Wiradjuri people.† (Talking To My Country, 2016, p. 223, para. 1) The author’s identity is also interrelated with country in its historical associations. I sensed that the author utilised history of country to expand in me an improved knowledge of and appreciation for collective histories. Grant (2016) highlights how Indigenous history is essential to the development of Australian identity. I felt while reading this book very honored as, the author bares his soul to reveal how his life has been formed by past and present Aboriginal experiences. Grant (2016, p. 69, para 3) makes use of the historical framework of country to underscore the powerful oral histories of pre and post colonisation that are entwined in his identity. He discloses too, the multiplicity of past and present-day Aboriginal traditional life. It is from within this framework that Grant (2016) exposes the appalling impact that government policies, legislation and legal decisions have had and continue to have, on Indigenous peoples. Grant (2016) elucidates that previously determinations made for the â€Å"benefit† of the country, played a part only in dividing the country for generations to come. Dodson (1994) argues that the strategies calculated to terminate Indigenous cultures were not perceived as ethnic extermination, but the charitable legacy of development. These procedures and legislature crushed not merely one generation but generations to come. The author’s identity is also explained by kinship. The basis of the kinship structure is that Aboriginal people consider their whole group as a family. The social qualities of the author’s family group were crucial in establishing his identity. Throughout Talking To My Country, Grant (2016) provides circumstantial stories about his parents, grandparents, cousins, aunties and uncles. As I read the book, I understood that from an early age, Aboriginal people learn who belongs to them, where they originate from and in what way they should conduct themselves relative to their kinship networks. Grant’s identity as an Aboriginal man in contemporary Australia holds intense significance. His identity appears at times to be a cross to endure. The book leaves me feeling that being an Aboriginal man in Australia has taken a heavy toll on Grant. The book opens with the young Grant drifting from one spot to the next and progresses to the damaging encounters of being withdrawn out of class at school by government representatives and scrapping with the white boys at school. Reading his narrative of his grandfather’s survival, and subsequent treatment, in the frontier wars and the continual reminder as he walked past the places as a child can only have been traumatic and potentially detrimental on the young Grant’s intuit of self. Muir (2006) contends that historical suffering is the communal, emotional and spiritual wound, throughout the lifetime of a person or a group. You read "Talking To My Country by Stan Grant" in category "Papers" In Talking To My Country , this wound festers in Grant’s grandfather’s and father’s individual lifespan and across generations to Grant’s and his son’s lifespan. Grant’s identity was further formed as a teen when he encountered racism at school. Even with the Federal Government in 1970 paying allowances to Aboriginal children to stay in school, he was removed to the principal’s office and informed that he and his cousins would be better off abandoning school because of their ethnicity. (Talking To My Country, 2016, p.45, Para.4) Stan Grant’s identity is founded on extremely juxtaposing emotions. I believe that Stan Grant’s identity incorporates both extraordinary sorrow and resentment. This is counterbalanced by Grant’s remarkable dignity in where he has come from an ancestrally, who he was, that young boy who was so ashamed of the colour of his skin and, the man he has become today, a family man, award winning reporter, television anchor and foreign correspondent. As an Aboriginal man living in contemporary Australia, Stan Grant has extended us in Talking To My Country an awareness into what it means to be an Aboriginal living in Australia. He addresses every Australian about our country as it was, is, and could be in the future. His book both criticizes the Australian dream and aspires to the new all-encompassing Australian dream which is only conceivable if we unlock our minds and hearts to the reality of Australia. Historical impact of the dispossession, oppression, and marginalisation of the Aboriginal people in Australia. â€Å"This was the space that history had made and the place it had reserved for people like us.† (Talking To My Country, 2016, p. 37, para. 4) This quote encapsulates the author’s feelings about the effect that colonisation, the subsequent government policies, legislation and legal determinations have had on Indigenous people. The author’s application of persuasive technique is clearly evident in this brief sentence that generates clout and achieves his point. The use sensory language arouses the feelings and generates intense pictures in my mind. This is specifically so in the words â€Å"†¦people like us.† (Talking To My Country, 2016, p.37, para. 4) which immediately makes me feel unnerved and chagrined. This quote is also intended as a statement on Australia’s history which Grant considers has pursued two distinct pathways, one Indigenous and one white Australian. Briskman (2014, Ch. 1, pg. 23, para. ) states that Indigenous people were and remain maltreated by the downgrading of their involvement in times past, rule and procedures in Australia and elsewhere. The premise of colonisation by the British was â€Å"terra nullius†, a lawful expression which declared that the land Australia belonged to no one. This was an unashamed rejection of the existence of Indigenous Australians as human beings. This principle fashioned the foundation of the association between Indigenous people and the nation state from its very establishment. This challenging connection has never completely been reconciled. From 1788 until current day colonial authorities have at no time joined in discussions with Indigenous people about appropriating their land. This absence of agreement must denote for Aboriginal people that they go on to experiencing the distress of occupation, dispossession and denial of acknowledgement. From 1788-1930’s thousands of Indigenous people engaged in battle with colonisers for their birthplace, kin and way of life. These wars have been excluded from history and subsequently people like myself had no understanding of the battle by Indigenous people for their country. From 1780’s-1920’s the Indigenous population was shattered, and Indigenous people were debased in order to rationalise the horrendous undertakings against them. I can’t start to realise the bearing the destruction of traditions, loss of cultural knowledge as whole family groups were slain had, on Indigenous people. This would have led to a crisis of identity and belonging which still effects people to the present day. Until I read this book I felt complicit in this as my being uninformed without doubt supplemented the invalidation and pain of many Indigenous people. From 1820’s to the present day the legislation and state policies of government worked to prevent Indigenous people from involvement as nationals through their extraction to reserves and missions. The effect of this today is that many Indigenous people are existing with the trauma of growing up in these circumstances. The colonisation of Australia preordained denial, ostracism and subjugation to the Aboriginal peoples. It commenced with their land being appropriated, their derestriction as human beings and advanced to their being tracked down and murdered and their children being taken. From the nineteenth century through to the 1970’s , the Australian Government presupposed lawful responsibility of all Aboriginal children and consequently isolated children away from their families with the intention of integrating them into European culture. The Human Rights and Equal Rights Opportunity Commission (1997) avows that this integration was founded on the hypothesis of black inferiority which recommended that Indigenous people must be permitted to die out within a progression of natural elimination, or where achievable integrated into the white community. The impact of this today is the disorder of Indigenous values and much Indigenous cultural knowledge being lost. Concurrently, numerous Indigenous people from the Stolen Generation never experienced residing in a beneficial family environment and subsequently never acquired parenting skills. From 1880-1960 social segregation signified that Indigenous people were marginalised in all facets of life. This led to Indigenous people being left without the entitlements and freedoms of that system including healthcare, education and employment. The impact of this today can be seen in elevated proportions of poverty, imprisonment, unemployment, homelessness, inferior health and deficiency in educational opportunities and outcomes. The Aboriginal people that did survive the Stolen Generation subsisted with unbearable anxiety and what we recognise today as trans-generational trauma. I personally understand trauma to be defined as an individual’s reaction to a major shattering occurrence that is so devastating, it disenables a person to the point that they are unable to come to terms with the event either for a short period of time or indefinitely and are, unable to move on with their life as it was before the event. The Healing Foundation (2013) explains trans-generational trauma as trauma, that is passed on from the first generation of survivors who wholly underwent or observed the trauma to future generations. Milroy in Zubrick et al (2014) argues in detail about the intensified consequences of unending exposure to elevated levels of trauma occasioning a communal emotional and psychological injury. Talking To My Country is a special interpretation of trans-generational trauma. The book is about Grant’s upbringing and consequent adult life, his own family and how Indigenous people in Australia have undergone trauma as a direct result of colonisation. This trauma has included the accompanying hostility, forfeiture of customs and land, as well as successive policies such as the enforced removal of children. Atkinson et al (2014) maintains there is an association between government policies and interventions and actions accompanying trauma events in Aboriginal people. Likewise, Kirmayer, Tait Simpson (2009) state that Indigenous people, everywhere in the world, have suffered colonisation, cultural subjugation, involuntary integration with little interest for their self-sufficiency. Talking To My Country underscores the trauma that colonisation and succeeding policies have begotten Indigenous people and the distressing after-effects that even now pervade indigenous culture today. These consequences include the interruption of culture and undesirable impacts on cultural distinctiveness that have been passed from generation to generation. Talking To My Country is one man’s journey through the increasing consequence of historical and inter-generational trauma. Grant (2016) repeatedly refers to aspects which subsidize the social, political and economic position of Indigenous people today and how these aspects have a great deal of their origin in historical policies and practices. Talking To My Country is a poignant account of Australian history, identity, and the bearing that government policies, legislation and legal decisions had and continues to have on Indigenous people. Briskman (2014, p.15, para.3) purports that history and policy are collective in their methods and results. Indigenous people who haven’t immediately gone through the happenings are nonetheless frequently crushed by the legacy left behind. Talking To My Country while being an insight into the trauma caused by colonisation is, also a challenge to Australians today to justly scrutinise what it signifies to be Australian today considering our history of settlement. It is an open invitation to consider our country as it was, as it is today and as it could be in the future. Talking To My Country is a cry for Australia to be honestly inclusive. There are no rejoinders or resolutions but there is the anticipation that, and opportunity for, the Australian dream will be accurately Australian and will hold close all Australians. How to cite Talking To My Country by Stan Grant, Papers

The Awakening Essay Research Paper The AwakeingA free essay sample

The Awakening Essay, Research Paper The Awakeing: A Woman # 8217 ; s Fight for Independence Right from the get downing the secret plan is about handily apparent. You find a adult female, Edna Pontellier, tired of life her life as a pampered and # 8220 ; owned # 8221 ; married woman and female parent. She is seeking for much more in her life, some kind of significance for her whole being. She searches for a long clip but in the terminal, the inevitableness of her life # 8217 ; s form and way wraps around her, smothering her. She is overcome with admiration, confusion, and guilt for what she believes and what she does to show her beliefs. She eventually finds a manner to crush the # 8220 ; proper # 8221 ; 1890 # 8217 ; s lifestyle by perpetrating self-destruction. During this narrative Edna struggles with three chief opposing powers. First, there is the society # 8217 ; s sentiment of what a adult female # 8217 ; s # 8220 ; functions # 8221 ; in life was and how they should move, look, and feel. We will write a custom essay sample on The Awakening Essay Research Paper The AwakeingA or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Second, is her independent nature. The last opposing power she comes across is her deathless love for the charming Robert Lebrun. It is the unwritten regulation that a adult female should get married, hold kids, and be happy and content with that as their life. Society portrays this to be a adult female # 8217 ; s rightful occupation and responsibility. A adult female should move and look # 8220 ; proper # 8221 ; at all times. This is what Edna is contending against in this novel. She feels that, though many adult females agree with this # 8220 ; known # 8221 ; regulation, it isn # 8217 ; t carnival. For six old ages Edna conforms to these thoughts by being a # 8220 ; proper # 8221 ; married woman and female parent, keeping Tuesday sociables and traveling to operas, following the same enduring agenda. It is merely after her summer spent at Grand Isle that her # 8220 ; mechanical # 8221 ; lifestyle becomes evident to her. She sees how much she is unhappy with the outlooks, held by society, of her life and she wishes to wipe out them and populate her life as she wants. Edna has an independent, about ego centered, nature about her. Her demand for an uncontrolled life style is what leaves her feeling # 8220 ; owned # 8221 ; and desiring to interrupt that label ; she fights to make as she wishes. Small by small she breaks free of society # 8217 ; s # 8217 ; image, allowing her independency radiance through. She cancels her Tuesday sociables and helps out around the house making small jobs. The biggest measure she made was her determination to travel off from her sign of the zodiac and into the # 8220 ; pigeon house # 8221 ; , a small bungalow around corner. After this move she was free to research her new profound freedom and desires. She succumbed to the passion in her bosom and had a meaningless matter with Arobin, a known heartbreaker. She was in control of this new relationship and she loved experiencing in control. True, she felt nil beyond lecherousness for the adult male but she was able to make as she wished. Her love for Robert Lebrun was genuinely her biggest obstruction she was to get the better of. Every idea and feeling she had sprouted from the love she had for him, which kept turning long after the brief summer in Grand Isle. She thought about him ever and was in changeless longing for him to return from his adventures in Mexico. When he eventually did return, his love for Edna was evident and he wished to be married to her. Once once more she felt trapped, non wishing to go # 8220 ; belongings # 8221 ; to a adult male. She merely wanted to be with him and love him without holding to give up her independency. When she left to help her friend in her childbirth, she bid him to remain and wait for her. Alas, when she returned he was gone, in his topographic point was a missive. He stated his love for her and his inability to maintain interfering with her life and her responsibilities to her hubby and kids. That was the terminal of Edna Pontellier. She feels entirely, with no 1 who would understand to confide into. Rather than be forced to populate in such a universe of dictatorship and succumb one time once more to the mechanical life style she had lived for so long, she chooses decease. In decease, there are no outlooks, no 1 to affect or be # 8220 ; proper # 8221 ; for, and most significantly she has no 1 to reply to, except herself. It is all these facets of the secret plan, in the narrative, that make it luring. It was so rare for a adult female to experience this manner back in those yearss. Edna is genuinely an admirable character. Her battle for independency against a societal universe that shows no clemency was a brave undertaking to seek and carry through. She tried difficult and even though she failed, it is her strength in which she fought that captured the Black Marias of the readers. Her battle and battle in the secret plan is inspirational and makes a individual realize merely lucky they are to be able to talk their heads and do as they wish. It besides contains a fresh touch o f world with its flooring stoping, go forthing you with the slightest intimation of uncertainty, was it all worth it?